I must confess I enjoy Richard Dawkins’ debates and talks on atheism and religion.
Whether he is an atheist, non-theist, non-believer, or agnostic, he knows that irritation is the best kind of stimulation.
I find Dawkins highly entertaining, but there are some arguments he never uses when denying the existence of god: an omniscient, omnipotent and omnipresent god should be intellectually approachable by any means. If reason does not work to explain God… a contradiction in terms arises…